I compared V For Vendetta and The Prisoner here and here.
In The Prisoner episode, "A, B and C," No 2 observes No 6's dreams on a screen and manipulates the dreams. This is like the para-reality programming. In the episode, "Do Not Forsake Me, Oh My Darling," the Village puts No 6's mind into another body.
In Neil Gaiman's Miracleman, the Qys (alien) called "Mors" (Latin for "death") asks Warhol no 6 to befriend Gargunza no 6 who is a prisoner but tries to escape after six months - also after Mors has given him a pomegranate, a mythological reference.
Also, former spies are subjected to para-reality programming and confined in "the City," of which Evelyn Cream says that he is its Number One. When No 1860 is allowed out into the real world, she wonders whether there is a realer world beyond it and feels that she is still being watched, just as No 6 realizes that he is not free from his enemies even when he is back in London.
Showing posts with label The Prisoner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Prisoner. Show all posts
Saturday, 12 December 2015
Wednesday, 9 January 2013
Who Are No 1 And V?
Years ago, DC Comics published a comic book sequel to The Prisoner TV series. My memory of the comic book series is that it did not live up to expectations and I did not keep the copies that I had bought.
The mini-series did have some high points:
years later, the former No 6 is now an obsessive recluse living on the Village island;
a younger character is shipwrecked, either by accident or by someone else's design, on the island;
the Leo McKern No 2 comes out of prison, travels to the island and fights with No 6, two old men struggling on the beach;
there is an interpretation of the climactic scene in "Fall Out" - No 6 went mad;
identification with any number, even with No 1, was a denial of his earlier refusal to be numbered.
But, over-all, I thought that the series did not make very much sense, did not go anywhere and did not lead to any conclusion.
In an earlier post, "007, No 6 and V," I compared the James Bond novels and The Prisoner with Alan Moore's graphic novel, V For Vendetta, and asked "Who was V?" I now want to compare this question with "Who is No 1?"
The Prisoner, set in a Cold War spy thriller scenario, raised certain kinds of questions:
Is No 6 identical with John Drake, the secret agent played by Patrick McGoohan in his previous TV series, Danger Man?
Why did he resign?
Which "side" runs the Village?
Who is No 1?
Is No 1 concealed in the Village or located elsewhere? (After all, the Village is part of a larger organization.)
Is the mute butler No 1? (He is present throughout, at the center of things.)
Where is the Village?
Are there two or more identical Villages in different parts of the world? (Different locations are cited. There are mountains near the Village at the beginning of "Many Happy Returns" but not at the end. At the end of "Fall Out," the characters do not sail but drive from the Village to London.)
When "Who is No 1?" is answered, the other questions are not answered but become irrelevant. The series has been an allegory for society. I am unfree because I have allowed myself to be and do not even realize that I have done this. It no longer matters why he resigned or which side runs the Village. Whether it is the East or the West, I am No 1, the cause of my unfreedom.
Similarly, the answer that I suggest to "Who is V?" renders irrelevant some questions that must otherwise arise, like:
How does this one character know so much about all the others?
How can he be so confident that the police will not find him hidden in the heart of London?
The answer given in The Prisoner is that the villain is the hero.
The answer that I suggest for V For Vendetta is that the hero is the author.
The mini-series did have some high points:
years later, the former No 6 is now an obsessive recluse living on the Village island;
a younger character is shipwrecked, either by accident or by someone else's design, on the island;
the Leo McKern No 2 comes out of prison, travels to the island and fights with No 6, two old men struggling on the beach;
there is an interpretation of the climactic scene in "Fall Out" - No 6 went mad;
identification with any number, even with No 1, was a denial of his earlier refusal to be numbered.
But, over-all, I thought that the series did not make very much sense, did not go anywhere and did not lead to any conclusion.
In an earlier post, "007, No 6 and V," I compared the James Bond novels and The Prisoner with Alan Moore's graphic novel, V For Vendetta, and asked "Who was V?" I now want to compare this question with "Who is No 1?"
The Prisoner, set in a Cold War spy thriller scenario, raised certain kinds of questions:
Is No 6 identical with John Drake, the secret agent played by Patrick McGoohan in his previous TV series, Danger Man?
Why did he resign?
Which "side" runs the Village?
Who is No 1?
Is No 1 concealed in the Village or located elsewhere? (After all, the Village is part of a larger organization.)
Is the mute butler No 1? (He is present throughout, at the center of things.)
Where is the Village?
Are there two or more identical Villages in different parts of the world? (Different locations are cited. There are mountains near the Village at the beginning of "Many Happy Returns" but not at the end. At the end of "Fall Out," the characters do not sail but drive from the Village to London.)
When "Who is No 1?" is answered, the other questions are not answered but become irrelevant. The series has been an allegory for society. I am unfree because I have allowed myself to be and do not even realize that I have done this. It no longer matters why he resigned or which side runs the Village. Whether it is the East or the West, I am No 1, the cause of my unfreedom.
Similarly, the answer that I suggest to "Who is V?" renders irrelevant some questions that must otherwise arise, like:
How does this one character know so much about all the others?
How can he be so confident that the police will not find him hidden in the heart of London?
The answer given in The Prisoner is that the villain is the hero.
The answer that I suggest for V For Vendetta is that the hero is the author.
Saturday, 5 January 2013
007, No 6 And V
007 = 7; No 6 = 6; V = 5 in Roman numerals.
Thus: 7, 6, 5.
007 is James Bond in novels by Ian Fleming
and his successors and in films starring Sean Connery and his successors. No 6
is the title character of Patrick McGoohan's The Prisoner TV series. V is
the title character of Alan Moore's and David Lloyd's V for Vendetta graphic novel. (Three
characters in four media: prose fiction (verbal); large and small screen drama
(audiovisual);
sequential art (visual-verbal).)

Moore simultaneously wrote Marvelman
and V, a superhero and a masked avenger, for Warrior magazine. Marvelman
was directly descended, via Captain Marvel, from Superman whereas V was not
directly descended from the archetypal comic book masked avenger, the Batman,
although a Batman "Elseworld" story did show Wayne opposing an American
dictatorship in an alternative history. V's appearance is based on that
attributed to Guy Fawkes and he completes the job attempted by Fawkes. Like the
Lone Ranger, V remains masked throughout. His face is unseen by the reader and
even by his close assistant. In this respect at least, he also resembles Judge
Dredd, a legalised vigilante in a futuristic city. (Moore also wrote an
unpublished Dredd script, a "last Superman story" and a pivotal Batman/Joker
story.)
In the Village, names are replaced
by numbers but faces are not usually masked. When, in the episode "A, B and C",
letters replace numbers, the previously unknown C leads No 6 to the masked D
who, when unmasked, turns out to be the current No 2, but this occurs within an
induced dream, thus in a "play within the play". In the concluding episode, No
6, unmasking No 1, significantly sees his own face. Prospero played by Vincent
Price in the film The Masque of the Red Death had the same experience
when he unmasked a red-garbed intruder who was his own personalised death.
At the end of V for Vendetta,
V's assistant, Evey, does not unmask the dead V but realises that her face must
be behind the mask. She becomes V. His sabotage and assassinations have
overthrown fascism. She hopefully will oversee without needing to intervene in
the growth of freedom. But, like Asimov's Second Foundation, she and her new
assistant will be able to intervene if necessary. In The Foundation Trilogy,
an unpredictable mutant disrupted Seldon's Plan but the hidden Second Foundation
existed to guard and restore the Plan. After the events of V for
Vendetta, neo-fascists could seek to regain control. Evey/V might be able to
prevent counter-revolution by encouraging more popular action. (She will not
continue V1's strategy of individual assassinations.)
Bond conventionally contends with
agents of a foreign dictatorship but does not change himself. The
self-sufficient No 6 potentially frees himself. V, inspired by Valerie, and
helped and succeeded by Evey, potentially frees society. Thus, the successive
series form a progressive conceptual tetralogy:
first, Ian Fleming's twelve James
Bond novels in which Bond mainly opposes Russian Intelligence (in fact, SPECTRE
involvement in three of Fleming's later novels is film-derived);
second, the first five Sean Connery James Bond films culminating in Bond's meeting with No 1, Ernst Stavro Blofeld, plus two further films with Blofeld as the acknowledged villain;
third, the seventeen episode Prisoner TV series culminating in the Prisoner's realisation that he is the unmasked No 1;
fourth, the V for Vendetta graphic novel culminating in Evey's realisation that she must be the masked V.
second, the first five Sean Connery James Bond films culminating in Bond's meeting with No 1, Ernst Stavro Blofeld, plus two further films with Blofeld as the acknowledged villain;
third, the seventeen episode Prisoner TV series culminating in the Prisoner's realisation that he is the unmasked No 1;
fourth, the V for Vendetta graphic novel culminating in Evey's realisation that she must be the masked V.
I exclude post-Fleming Bond novels,
post-Connery Bond films,
Prisoner spin-offs and the V for Vendetta film. At the time of
writing, December 2009, I have not yet seen the new Prisoner TV series.
Who is V? When leading Evey to the
roof of the building at the moment of her psychological liberation, he resembles
a robed Christ but we should not regard a multiple manipulator and murderer as
the Messiah. When addressing the public on video, he speaks as if he were
mankind's creator but this is ironic. It has been suggested that V is Marvelman,
who is deified in his own series. The only evidence for this identification, I
think, is that, when seen in silhouette before donning the mask, V seems to be
crew cut. Both V and MM result from, very different, government experiments. V's
experience motivates him to overthrow that government. MM and his Pantheon are
so powerful that they effortlessly displace the nuclear powers and the UN. V
destroys a dystopia. MM builds a utopia. Their stories are complementary, not
convergent. Like Superman (day) and Batman (night), they are archetypal
opposites.
The anarchist V opposes all
governments but has additional personal reasons to resist Norse Fire. He
assassinates individuals not only because of their present positions in the
state apparatus but also because of their past dealings with the man in Room V.
For example, he forces the Bishop of London to consume a poisoned Communion
wafer. The Bishop, who preached sermons dictated by the Fate computer to
congregations including high Party members, had also previously been the
concentration camp chaplain.
Much of the characterisation,
dialogue and plot in V for Vendetta
is realistic but V's omniscience about the other characters is surreal. On the
one hand, he is a particular character whose face was seen by his captors,
though not by us, in the concentration camp. On the other hand, he is endlessly
resourceful and manipulative and supremely confident that the state police will
not find him hidden in the heart of London. Only the disaffected detective is
going to find him and V somehow knows what the outcome of that encounter will
be. He knows which Party widow will assassinate the Leader. Only the author can
know so much about the characters.
Authors can be incarnated in their
stories. Very occasionally, the first person narrator really is the author. For
example, CS Lewis exchanges letters with Ransom at the end of the first Ransom
novel and meets him at the beginning of the second. But incarnated authors need
not be narrators. The comic strip is mostly un-narrated and Alan Moore's
incarnation in it is masked. Evey cannot see his face because she would have to
look off the page to do so.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)